Translations:Inventariseren en waarderen van museum(directeurs)archief/9/en: verschil tussen versies
Naar navigatie springen
Naar zoeken springen
Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met 'For the valuation, a choice was made between different valuation tools. ‘Significance 2.0’ and ‘Significance 3.0’ are currently the most well-known. The dis...' |
(geen verschil)
|
Huidige versie van 28 mrt 2025 om 12:48
For the valuation, a choice was made between different valuation tools. ‘Significance 2.0’ and ‘Significance 3.0’ are currently the most well-known. The disadvantage of ‘Significance 2.0’ is that it does not take into account scores for valuations or the different levels at which valuation occurs. ‘Significance 3.0’ includes extensive guiding questions and does consider scores and levels. A disadvantage is that this tool has not yet been applied to archives. Also, the best-developed examples relate to Australia, making it more difficult to ask questions about the process.