Translations:Inventariseren en waarderen van museum(directeurs)archief/9/en

Uit Tracks
Versie door Bart Magnus (overleg | bijdragen) op 28 mrt 2025 om 12:48 (Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met 'For the valuation, a choice was made between different valuation tools. ‘Significance 2.0’ and ‘Significance 3.0’ are currently the most well-known. The dis...')
(wijz) ← Oudere versie | Huidige versie (wijz) | Nieuwere versie → (wijz)
Naar navigatie springen Naar zoeken springen

For the valuation, a choice was made between different valuation tools. ‘Significance 2.0’ and ‘Significance 3.0’ are currently the most well-known. The disadvantage of ‘Significance 2.0’ is that it does not take into account scores for valuations or the different levels at which valuation occurs. ‘Significance 3.0’ includes extensive guiding questions and does consider scores and levels. A disadvantage is that this tool has not yet been applied to archives. Also, the best-developed examples relate to Australia, making it more difficult to ask questions about the process.